communication

Pictureimage from www.uihere.com/
This criterion assesses whether the report has been presented in a way that supports effective communication in terms of structure, coherence and clarity. The focus, process and outcomes of your report are all well presented..
Communication (3)
Presentation:
  • A consistent linguistic style is maintained throughout the writing.
  • No spelling or grammar errors are present.
  • Written in past tense with good paragraph structure.
  • Legible font style and size are used.
  • Use of color in images or graphs is appropriate.
  • Citations given for all material taken from sources.
  • All unneeded or unnecessary information in an appendix
  • All sections properly headed clearly and in the same format - 1.5 spacing
  • Clear fonts, no funny colors, etc
  • Include in-text citations where necessary (typically background, hypothesis, and conclusion) Single accepted format
  • Include a works cited page? (Is it in alphabetical order?) Is it all in a single acceptable format (MLA, APA, or Chicago

Structure:
  • There are clear headings for each section, with consistent formatting.
  • Graphs, tables, images sequentially titled (i.e. “Figure 1…”).
  • Graphs, tables and images included as close as possible to its first reference.
  • Tables and graphs do not break across pages.
  • Parenthetical in-text references/citations are given in consistent format.
  • A Works Cited List with consistent formatting is given at the end of the report.
  • Sources are written in alphabetical order by author’s last name.
  • Between 1,500 & 2,250 words

Focus:
  • All data, graphs and images are relevant to the RQ.
  • All citations are relevant to the RQ.
  • All analysis and discussion are relevant to the RQ.

​Terminology & Conventions:​
  • Tables are well organized, with specific and clear title, headings and units.
  • Table column headers are present and correct (IV in first column).
  • Graphs are well organized, with specific and clear titles, labeled axis (with unit) and appropriately scaled axis.
  • Images annotated with captions to add information of value to the investigation.
  • Avoid excessive use of jargon.
  • Non-standard technical terms are explained and used in the correct context.
  • You reflect what your lab is actually about
  • Academic Integrity. Is it below 20%? 
Communications Rubric