internal assessment - communications

Communication

This criterion assesses whether the investigation is presented and reported in a way that supports effective communication of the focus, process and outcomes.

Presentation:

• A consistent linguistic style is maintained throughout the writing.
• No spelling or grammar errors are present.
• Written in past tense with good paragraph structure.
• Legible font style and size are used.
• Use of color in images or graphs is appropriate.
• Citations given for all material taken from sources.

Structure:

• There are clear headings for each section, with consistent formatting.
• Graphs, tables, images sequentially titled (i.e. “Figure 1…”).
• Graphs, tables and images included as close as possible to its first reference.
• Tables and graphs do not break across pages.
• Parenthetical in-text references/citations are given in consistent format.
• A Works Cited List with consistent formatting is given at the end of the report.
• Sources are written in alphabetical order by author’s last name.
• Paper is 6-12 pages in length.

Focus:

• All data, graphs and images are relevant to the RQ.
• All citations are relevant to the RQ.
• All analysis and discussion are relevant to the RQ.

​Terminology & Conventions:​

• Tables are well organized, with specific and clear title, headings and units.
• Table column headers are present and correct (IV in first column).
• Graphs are well organized, with specific and clear titles, labeled axis (with unit) and appropriately scaled axis.
• Images annotated with captions to add information of value to the investigation.
• Avoid excessive use of jargon.
• Non-standard technical terms are explained and used in the correct context.